Stock Market News

Stay updated with the latest stock market news and insights

Key Points

Hillary Clinton told journalist Kara Swisher she is "most worried about the flood of money from the Elon Musks" heading into next week's midterm elections.
Elon Musk was reportedly planning to spend more than $360 million funding GOP candidates, a move Sen. Bernie Sanders criticized as an effort to keep Republicans in power to amass more wealth.
Clinton also flagged Trump supporters "distorting the election, confusing voters," but argued that high gas prices mean people are "voting their reality."
Musk is backing Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton in the Senate race, donating $158 million to political groups supporting Paxton against Democrat James Talarico.
With the Iran war keeping fuel costs elevated, the national average for gas sat at $4.2258/gallon and diesel at $6.3347/gallon, per AAA data.

Get Tesla Alerts

Weekly insights + SMS alerts

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has a pretty clear read on what could sink Democrats next week, and it isn't a policy paper. It's a checkbook. Specifically, the checkbooks of billionaires like Tesla Inc. (NASDAQ:TSLA) CEO Elon Musk.

Clinton took to X on Thursday, sharing a clip from her interview with journalist Kara Swisher. Asked what worried her ahead of the midterms, she didn't hedge. "I'm most worried about the flood of money from the Elon Musks," she said.

'Reality Contradicts Donald Trump,' Hillary Clinton Says

Money wasn't her only concern. Clinton also pointed to Trump supporters "distorting the election, confusing voters, convincing them either not to show up and vote because it doesn't matter," calling that the Democrats' "biggest challenge" as things stand.

But she wasn't all doom and gloom. Clinton said she's optimistic because people are "voting their reality," and that reality has a price tag at the pump. "When you pull up to fill up your tank or your tractor, for heaven's sake, the reality contradicts Donald Trump and his cult members," she said, predicting that the "distortion and the gaslighting just may not work."

She drove the point home: "Trump and the Republicans are trying to tell you don't believe your own eyes. And I think people are smarter than that."

In her post on X, Clinton framed it as a fight between Musk's millions and everyday math: "Elon Musk is flooding the midterms with money to help Trump. But even his millions may not be enough to counteract reality."

The Money in Question

How much money are we talking about? Musk was reportedly planning to spend more than $360 million to fund GOP candidates during the midterm elections. That figure drew fire from Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), who accused the Space Exploration Technologies Corp. (NASDAQ:SPCX) CEO of wanting to keep the GOP in power to amass more wealth.

Musk's spending isn't purely national. He's also supporting Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton in the Senate race, donating $158 million to political groups backing Paxton against Democratic Senate candidate James Talarico.

Gas Prices, Oil Movement

Clinton's "reality" argument runs straight through the fuel station, and the numbers there are not subtle. As tensions escalate amid the ongoing war with Iran, gas prices have remained elevated. According to data collected by the American Automobile Association (AAA), the national average price of gas was $4.2258/gallon. The same data suggests that the national average was $3.0384/gallon.

On the diesel front, the national average was $6.3347/gallon, despite Trump signing an executive order to allow the sale of dyed diesel for highway use temporarily.

Markets are watching the same pump. Oil ETFs like the ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (NYSE:UCO) rose 0.28% to $67.00 during overnight trading on Thursday. The United States Oil Fund (NYSE:USO) ETF also recorded a 0.39% rise to $168.85 during overnight trading.

So the closing argument from Clinton is less about policy detail and more about the receipt in your hand. Musk can flood the zone with cash, but he can't set the price at the pump. Whether voters weigh the wallet or the wallet-sized ad campaign is the question that gets answered next week.